November 18, 2018

ASTM E1417/E1417M-13 PDF

Documents Similar To ASTM E EM Penetrant Testing Class Room Training Book. Uploaded by. Anonymous gFcnQ4go · ASTM-EEM-. 16 Jul ASTM E/EM, “Standard Practice for Liquid Penetrant Testing,” has just been released as the new Edition. The document. This standard is issued under the fixed designation E ; the number 1 This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E-7 on Nonde- structive 8 Available from American National Standards Institute, 11 West 42nd Street, 13th.

Author: Turisar Tozragore
Country: Honduras
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Video
Published (Last): 9 March 2012
Pages: 309
PDF File Size: 2.64 Mb
ePub File Size: 2.73 Mb
ISBN: 241-8-26285-340-2
Downloads: 34091
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Kem

Major takeaways from your write-up are the following: King – The penetration of a soft solid by a liquid jet, with application to the administration of a needle-free injection. Indication sizing In Reply to 1e417/e1417m-13 at Visible Dye Penetrant Inspection Process.

We never charge a fee for part evaluations, in the event that there is a question concerning a part. The material is not ferromagnetic. Work Item s – e1417e/1417m-13 revisions of this standard.

ASTM E/EM – Standard Practice for Liquid Penetrant Testing

Don’t know much about aerospace, but the codes we use say: We can offer measurable savings on many items you are currently outsourcing and we can create innovative strategies for taking on new problem parts. Their position is to make all the interfaces with the customer and interpret the requirements. Ducts can be pressure tested up to psig, as needed.

Maria StrantzaDimitrios G.

It was a great learning discussing this matter with you. Should we talk about their detection sensitivity or their ability to detect discontinuities? This standard is not included in any packages. Who would have looked at the size, construction, and overall strength astn the component to make the determination that 3 rounded discontinuities less than 2mm in size would not have an adverse effect on the performance of the component in its normal configured use.


If you arw required to do PT and your code says 10mm indication is e1417/e1417m-3 acceptable, than you reject it.

Customer procedure on acceptance reads: Guide to penetrant inspection materials. Codes try to achieve a common ground but are not substitutes for good design and individual judgement. Hence it makes sense to use the size of the indication. Liquid Penetrant Testing 2. Dye Penetrant Operation Instructions.

Using the standard terminology in non-destructive testing: Welds a discontinuity might be acceptable as long as its severity did not bring it outside the limits for acceptance. Have the Level III e1417/e1417m1-3 the acceptance criteria on how measurements are to be taken. Unfortunately, or fortunately depending on your perspective, there can be a lot of grey areas when it comes to structural discontinuities in the air industry. We have even built mobile aircraft jacks.

Tag: ASTM E1417/E1417m-13

I had some good learning through this discussion. Sensitivity or ability to detect discontinuities of the MT detection media – PT and MT chemicals packaging – The laws of chance – E1417/e1417,-13 magnetic inks? As you have stated, some specifications do allow sizing of the actual flaw size as seen under visible or white light.

We have no amendments or corrections for this standard. For example many welds have some flaws that are acceptable such as minor porosity.

Mihael Kuhar – Metode ispitivanja zavarenih spojeva bez razaranja i njihova primjena u proizvodnji trafokotlova.


Astmm which method is to be used required should be understood by any inspector. Solvent-based developer or satm wet developer? Your point that “It is for this reason that a lot of codes use the term discontinuity as it then allows the client or the code itself to make the determination as to e1417/e1417,-13 or not the flaw is an acceptable or rejectable item” is not very clear to me.

Available documents Click here to find all articles. Dear James, I agree with your logic that most codes do not use the words ‘defect’ but instead say ‘discontinuity’. However this doesn’t preclude an owner or other Structural AME from deciding that the discontinuity especially if it is not covered by one of the maintenance manuals from making the call.

The penetrant systems product families are qualified after determining their e1417/e1417j-13 levels according to the ISO standard, when using the Type 1 reference blocks of the ISO standard.

Prior to examination, tests should be conducted to ensure that none astj the cleaning or examination materials are harmful to the components to be examined.

The indication is still there and should be noted in your report for future reference but the component is servicable. The Laws of chance. What you wrote is logical – VT sees the discontinuity either with the unaided eye or with a suitable magnification, but that is taken care as a known factor.

Indication sizing In Reply to Tim at