DoDAF has been designed to meet the specific business and operational needs of . These Views are supported by DoDAF , and should be consulted for. DoDAF Architecture Framework Version The Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) is an architecture framework for. The DoD Architecture Framework (DoDAF) Version facilitates the ability of Department of Defense (DoD) managers at all levels to make key decisions more .
|Published (Last):||11 March 2004|
|PDF File Size:||5.63 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||8.80 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The Capability Models describe capability taxonomy and capability evolution. One concern about the DoDAF is how well these products meet actual stakeholder concerns for any given system of interest.
Product Descriptions” and a “Deskbook”. Architectural support to PfM tends to focus on the investment decision itself although not exclusivelyand assists in justifying investments, evaluating the risk, and providing a capability gap analysis.
Each of these three levels of the DM2 is important to a particular viewer of Departmental processes:. The viewpoints categorize the models as follows: SE processes are applied to allow an orderly progression dldaf one level of development to the next detailed level using controlled baselines. doddaf
When data is collected and presented as a “filled-in” model, the result is called a view. The primary objective of the JCIDS process is dodag ensure warfighters receive the capabilities required to execute their assigned missions successfully. However, it should be emphasized that DoDAF is fundamentally about creating a coherent model of the enterprise to enable effective decision-making.
The Views described in DoDAF, including those that are legacy Views from previous versions of the Framework, are provided as pre-defined examples that can be used when developing presentations of architectural data. DoD Acquisition policy directs all programs responding to a capabilities or requirements document, regardless of acquisition category, to apply a robust SE approach .20 balances total system performance and total cost with the family-of-systems, and system-of-systems context.
The support for the Key Processes is for the information requirements that were presented at the workshops for the key processes and, as such, do not reflect all of the information requirements that a key process could need. These products are organized under four views:. It addressed the Deputy Secretary of Defense directive that a DoD-wide effort be 20 to define and develop a better means and process for ensuring that C4ISR capabilities were interoperable and met the needs of the warfighter.
In simpler terms, integration is seen in the connection from items common among architecture products, where items shown in one architecture product such as sites used or systems interfaced or services provided should have the identical number, name, and meaning appear in related architecture product views.
DODAF Viewpoints and Models
Facilitates cross-agency analysis and the identification of duplicative investments, gaps, and opportunities for collaboration within and across Federal Agencies.
DoDAF does not prescribe any particular Views, but instead concentrates on data as the necessary ingredient for architecture development. Skip to main content Press Enter. The approach depends on the requirements and the expected results; i. Federal law and policies have expressed the need dodat architectures in support of business decisions.
While it is clearly aimed at military systems, DoDAF has broad applicability across the private, public and voluntary sectors around the world, and represents one of a large number of systems architecture frameworks. JCIDS process owners have written policy to support architecture requirements i.
Government and Defense
As the DM2 matures to meet the ongoing data requirements of process owners, decision makers, architects, and new technologies, it will evolve to a resource that more completely supports the requirements for architectural data, published in a consistently understandable way, 2.00 will enable greater ease for discovering, sharing, and reusing architectural data across organizational boundaries.
The Services portion of the older Systems and Services Viewpoint is now a Services Dodwf that addresses in more detail our net-centric or services-oriented implementations.
Tailoring the architectural description development to address specific, well-articulated, and understood purposes, will help ensure the necessary data is collected at the appropriate level of detail to support specific decisions or objectives. The Department of Defense Architecture Framework DoDAF is an architecture framework for the United States Department of Defense DoD that provides visualization infrastructure for specific stakeholders concerns through viewpoints organized by various views.
This Architecture Framework is especially suited ddodaf large systems with complex integration and interoperability challenges, and it is apparently unique in its employment of “operational views”. The repository is defined by the common database schema Core Architecture Data Model 2. The architect and stakeholders select views to ensure that architectures will explain current and future states of the process or activity under review.
The concept of capability, as defined by its Meta-model Data Group allows one to answer questions such as:. DoDAF generically describes in the representation of the artifacts to be generated, but allows considerable flexibility regarding the specific formats and modeling techniques.
Background – DODAF – DOD Architecture Framework Version – DOD Deputy Chief Information Officer
In April the Version 1. All view AV products provide overarching descriptions of the entire architecture and define the scope and context of the architecture.
No Magic also leads the industry in usability and interoperability, ensuring that you avoid unnecessary rodaf, schedule and performance risk.
The tool automates and assists the process of resource allocation ensuring mission critical project success. The Systems Viewpoint accommodates the legacy system descriptions. To facilitate the use of information at the data layer, the DoDAF describes a set of models for visualizing data through graphic, tabular, or textual means.
Models can be documents, spreadsheets, dashboards, or other graphical representations and serve as a template for organizing and displaying data in a more easily understood format. Overview Product Offerings Professional Services.
DoD weapons and information technology system acquisitions are required to develop and document an enterprise architecture EA using the views prescribed in the DoDAF. E-Government Act of The DM2 defines architectural data elements and enables the integration and federation of Architectural Descriptions.
SV products focus on specific physical systems with dodar physical geographical locations. Node is a complex, logical concept that is represented with more concrete concepts.
A presentation of these viewpoints is portrayed in graphic format below: Capability architecting is done primarily to support the definition of capability requirements.
As illustrated below, the original viewpoints Operational Viewpoint, Systems and Services Viewpoint, Technical Standards Viewpoint, and the All Viewpoint have had their Models reorganized to better address their purposes. In most doodaf, an enterprise will capture its routine or repeatable business and mission operations as architectural content.
Selecting Architecture Viewpoints carefully ensures that the views adequately frame concerns, e. Teams will find it easier to take the abstract and make it meaningful, and achieve net-centric results.