August 13, 2019


Section 1 is the Introduction to this volume. Section 2 .. These DoDAF data groups support both DoDAF viewpoints and the DoD key processes: the Joint. DoDAF Volume 2 describes the technical aspects of data collection presentation descriptions and DoDAF-described Models in Volumes 1 and 2 provide guidance DoDAFV is intended to be methodology agnostic. DoDAF Architecture Framework Version The Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) is an architecture framework for . OV-1 High Level Operational Concept Graphic: High level graphical and .. DoDAF V · Printable version of DoDAF V Volume 1 · Printable version of DoDAF V Volume 2.

Author: Shakashura Mijar
Country: Malaysia
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Marketing
Published (Last): 10 August 2015
Pages: 456
PDF File Size: 6.86 Mb
ePub File Size: 5.25 Mb
ISBN: 622-1-81495-722-9
Downloads: 42531
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Zukazahn

Commons category link is on Wikidata. DoD weapons and information technology system acquisitions are required to develop and document an enterprise architecture EA using the views prescribed in volums DoDAF.

Department of Defense Architecture Framework

DoDAF has a meta-model underpinning the framework, defining the types of modelling elements that can be used in each view and the relationships between them. The sequence of the voume listed below gives a suggested order in which the artifacts could be developed. Otherwise there is the risk of producing products with no customers. Definitions and Guidelines”, “II: As one example, the DoDAF v1. In this manner, the DM2 supports the exchange and reuse of architectural information among JCAs, Components, and Federal and Ddoaf partners, thus facilitating the understanding and implementation of interoperability of processes and systems.

Department of Defense for dodxf enterprise architecture has been debated:. The three views volumme their interrelationships — driven by common architecture data 22.0 — provide the basis for deriving measures such as interoperability or performance, and for measuring the impact of the values of these metrics on operational mission and task effectiveness.

The developing system must not only meet its internal data needs but also those of the operational framework into which it is set. One concern about the DoDAF is how well these products meet actual stakeholder concerns for any given system of interest. For the purposes of architecture development, the term integrated means that data required in more than one of the architectural models is commonly defined and understood across those models.

These views are artifacts for dodar, understanding, and assimilating the broad scope and complexities of an architecture description through tabularstructuralbehavioralontologicalpictorialtemporalgraphicalprobabilisticor alternative conceptual means.


DoD Business Systems Modernization: The concept of capability, as defined by its Meta-model Data Group allows one to answer questions such as:. While it is clearly aimed at military systems, DoDAF has broad applicability across the private, public and voluntary sectors around the world, and represents volkme of a large number of systems architecture frameworks. It defines the type of information exchanged, the frequency of exchanges, the tasks and activities supported by these exchanges and the nature of the exchanges.

These views offer overview and details aimed to specific stakeholders within their domain and in interaction with other domains in which the system will operate. Product Descriptions” and a “Deskbook”.

Each of these three levels of the DM2 is important to a particular viewer of Departmental processes:. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. It colume the Deputy Secretary of Defense directive that a DoD-wide effort be undertaken to define and develop a better means and process for ensuring that C4ISR capabilities were interoperable and met the needs of the warfighter.

United States Department of Defense information technology Volime architecture frameworks.

Department of Defense Architecture Framework – Wikipedia

It establishes data element definitions, rules, and relationships and a baseline set of products for consistent development of systems, integrated, or federated architectures. The figure represents the information that links the operational view, systems and services view, and technical standards view.

This Architecture Framework is especially suited to large systems with complex integration and interoperability challenges, and it is apparently unique in its employment of “operational views”. These views relate to stakeholder requirements for producing an Architectural Description.

The DoDAF provides a foundational framework for developing and representing architecture descriptions that ensure a common denominator for understanding, comparing, and integrating architectures across organizational, joint, and multinational boundaries.

The relationship between architecture data elements across the SV to the OV can be exemplified as systems are procured and fielded to support organizations and their operations.

TRAK Community :: Wiki :: DODAF

The repository is defined by the common database schema Core Vlume Data Model 2. The Capability Models describe capability taxonomy and capability evolution. A capability thread would equate to the specific activities, rules, and systems that volu,e linked to that particular capability.


It broadened the applicability of architecture tenets and practices to all Mission Areas rather than just the C4ISR community. Operational View OV products provide descriptions of the tasks and activities, operational elements, and information exchanges required to accomplish DoD missions. Each view depicts certain perspectives of an architecture as described below. Retrieved from ” https: Views Read Edit View history.

In addition to graphical representation, there is typically a requirement to provide metadata to the Defense Information Technology Portfolio Repository DITPR or other architectural repositories. DoDAF generically describes in the representation of the artifacts to be generated, but allows considerable flexibility regarding the specific formats and modeling techniques. The Department of Defense Architecture Framework DoDAF is an architecture framework for the United States Department of Defense DoD that provides visualization infrastructure for specific stakeholders concerns through viewpoints organized by various views.

In April the Version 1. These architecture descriptions may include families of systems FoSsystems of systems SoSand net-centric capabilities for interoperating and interacting in the non-combat environment.

In simpler terms, integration is seen in the connection from items common among architecture products, where items shown in one architecture product such as sites used or doadf interfaced or services provided should dodat the identical number, name, and meaning appear in related architecture product views.

Node is a complex, logical concept that is represented with more concrete concepts. Integrated architectures are a property or design principle for architectures at all levels: It establishes a basis for semantic i. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. The DM2 defines architectural data elements and enables the integration and federation of Architectural Descriptions. The OV provides textual and graphical representations of operational nodes and elements, assigned tasks and activities, and information flows between nodes.

Technical standards view TV products define technical standards, ovlume conventions, business rules and criteria that govern the architecture. There are many different approaches for creating an integrated architecture using DoDAF and for determining which products are required.

The DoDAF deskbook provides examples in using traditional systems engineering and data engineering techniques, and secondly, UML format.